Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Education Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maben, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Health promotion in primary health care nursing: the development of quality indicators

Jill Macleod Clark

School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD E-mail jmc{at}soton.ac.uk.

Jill Maben

School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD

This paper describes the development of indicators of quality in the health promo tion work of primary health care nurses through a study commissioned by the Health Education Authority (HEA). The study commenced with a review of the accident- prevention literature in primary health care nursing and three in-depth workshops with locality-based project teams consisting of commissioners of primary health care nursing services, primary health care nurses themselves, and their managers. Potential indicators of quality were identified from the literature and explored further within the workshops. The second phase of the study involved refining and testing the relevance of the indicators in practice through stakeholder interviews and the third phase focused on case studies of six areas of primary health care nursing prac tice. Client perspectives were actively sought and ten consumer-focused process indicators emerged. These have the potential to provide measures of quality in health promotion activities undertaken by primary health care nurses.

Key Words: health promotion • primary care • nurses • quality indicators

Health Education Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, 99-119 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/001789699905800202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
Y. Rafferty and A. Radosh
AIDS prevention and condom availability in an urban school system: facilitating factors and programme challenges
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2000; 59(1): 50 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]