Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Education Journal
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joslin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, N A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Employee characteristics and participation in a worksite wellness programme

Beth Joslin

University of Iowa, USA

John B Lowe

University of Iowa, USA, john-lowe{at}uiowa.edu

N Andrew Peterson

University of Iowa, USA

Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the underlying structure of participation in a worksite wellness programme, and to examine the relationship between the demographic and quality of life (QOL) characteristics of employees, and the wellness programme offerings in which they choose to participate.

Design The cross-sectional design of this study involved gathering data from individuals at one point in time, following their decision to participate (or not participate) in a worksite wellness programme.

Setting This study involved county government employees in a Midwestern United States community.

Method Surveys were mailed to a random sample of 329 county government employees. The survey included demographics and measured QOL via the Short Form-36 (SF-36). One-week and three-week follow-ups were conducted in attempt to increase the survey response rate.

Results Two dimensions of wellness programme participation were identified to exist among wellness programme participants: (1) medical offerings; and (2) health education offerings. Certain employee characteristics were associated with participation in each of the two dimensions of participation.

Conclusion Findings suggest demographic and QOL characteristics may predict the type of employees a programme might expect to participate in wellness offerings. Results may be useful for worksite wellness programme coordinators regarding tailoring programme offerings, participant recruitment, and education efforts, based on the characteristics of the employee population.

Key Words: quality of life • worksite wellness References

References

  • Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century . The Fourth International Conference on Health Promotion: New Players for a New Era-Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century. Jakarta, 21-25 July 1997.
  • Pencak M. Workplace health promotion programs: An overview . Nursing Clinics of North America, 1991: 26(1): 233-239 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Reardon J. The history and impact of worksite wellness . Nursing Economics, 1998: 16(3): 117-121 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, Benedict S, Kelsey K, Belton L, Sanhueza A. Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: Health works for women . Preventive Medicine, 2002: 34: 313-323 .[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Serxner SA, Gold DB, Grossmeier JJ, Anderson DR. The relationship between health promotion program participation and medical costs: A dose response . Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003: 45(11): 1196-1200 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bagwell M, Bush H. Improving health promotion for blue-collar workers . Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 2000: 14(4): 65-71 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Spilman MA. Gender differences in worksite health promotion activities . Soc. Sci. Med., 1988: 26(5): 525-535 .[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • United States Census Bureau, Census 2000. Online. Available: www.census.gov (accessed 2004).
  • Ware Jr JE. SF-36 Health Survey Update . SPINE, 2000: 25(24): 3130-3139 .[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ware Jr JE, Kosinski MK, Dewey JE. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Rhode Island: Medical Outcomes Trust and Quality Metric Incorporated , 2002.
  • Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys (pp. 160-188). New York: John Wiley , 1978.
  • Green SB, Salkind NJ, Akey TM. Using SPSS for Windows Analyzing & Understanding Data, 2nd edn (pp. 236-236, 295-297). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall , 2000.
  • Sherry A, Henson RK. Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer . Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005: 84(1): 37-48 .[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Steinhardt M, Dolbier C, Gottlieb N, McCalister K. The relationship between hardiness, supervisor support, group cohesion, and job stress as predictors of job satisfaction . American Journal of Health Promotion, 2003: 17(6): 382-389 .[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Power of Prevention (pp. 1-26). United States Department of Health and Human Services , 2003.
  • Watt D, Verma S, Flynn L. Wellness programs: A review of the evidence . Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1998: 158(2): 224-230 .[Abstract]
  • World Health Organization. Chronic Disease Facts. Online. Available: www.who.int/ (accessed November 2005).
  • Valente T. Evaluating Health Promotion Programs (pp. 123-133). New York: Oxford University Press , 2002.

Health Education Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, 308-319 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0017896906069367


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joslin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, N A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?